Rent vs Own in Retirement
"Owning your home in retirement" sounds like the goal — but owning has real annual costs (taxes, insurance, maintenance). Renting trades stability for liquidity. See what each scenario costs over a 25-year retirement.
Your scenario
Own the home outright
Total owning costs over horizon
—
Home value at end of horizon
—
Net wealth at end
—
Sell home, rent, invest proceeds
Total rent over horizon
—
Investment balance at end
—
Net wealth at end
—
The hidden cost of "free" home ownership
People often say "my home is paid off so my housing is free." It's not. Real annual costs typically run 2-4% of home value:
- Property tax: 0.5-2% depending on state
- Insurance: 0.3-0.7%
- Maintenance: 1-2% (roof every 25y, HVAC every 15y, plumbing surprises)
- HOA, if applicable: variable
On a $500k home, that's $12,500-$20,000/year just to live in a place you "already own." Compare to renting an equivalent unit — often within range.
Why owning still tends to win in retirement
- Inflation protection. Your property tax may go up, but it's anchored to home value. Rent goes up year after year compounded — over 25 years at 3% inflation, rent doubles.
- Home appreciation. The equity grows tax-free (mostly — first $250k/$500k of capital gains on primary residence exempt).
- Stability. Landlords sell, raise rent dramatically, or refuse to renew. Owning eliminates housing risk.
- Sentimental. Familiar place, accumulated stuff, community ties.
When renting in retirement wins
- You'd downsize anyway. Selling a $700k home and renting a $2k/mo apartment frees up cash and removes maintenance burden.
- High-tax / high-cost area. If property taxes are 2%+ of value, ownership is expensive.
- You want to relocate often. Snowbird, traveling, family in different cities.
- You need liquidity. Medical costs, helping kids. Equity in a house is illiquid; cash isn't.
- You'd invest the equity well. A 6% return on $500k = $30k/year, which can cover a lot of rent.